Legal Opinion
Meyer Kornblum & Son, Inc. v. Excess Ins.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 7, 1935No. 7484PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
The motion is to dismiss the complaint on the ground of insufficiency.
On October 1, 1930, the Hudson Casualty Insurance Company issued its policy of insurance to the plaintiff to insure and indemnify the plaintiff against loss or damage resulting from an injury or injuries suffered by any person by reason of the op*204eration of a motor vehicle belonging to the plaintiff. This policy likewise obligated the insurer to defend all actions for damage for personal injuries at its own expense, and further provided that, in the event of any judgment being rendered against the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Harbeck v. . VanderbiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Allemannia Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Baltimore Ex Rel. WolfeSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ten Eyck v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Greenman v. General Reinsurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Murphy v. Mandon Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1939