Espinoza v. Rudolph
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
COBB, Chief Justice.
Antonio Ben Espinoza and Antonio Espinoza d/b/a Jabez Land Co. (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Jabez”) 1 appeal from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Maxine Rudolph in the amount of $50,000 in compensatory damages and $25,000 in punitive damages. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History 2
Rudolph is the owner of real property on which is located a single-family residence (“the property”). According to Rudolph, the fair market value of the property is $59,000. For more than 10 years, until January 2007, Rudolph resided in the house on the property. From March…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ex Parte PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- White Sands Group, LLC v. PRS II, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Gaston v. AmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- TRANSAMERICA COM. FIN. v. AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Reed v. BD. OF TRUSTEES FOR AL. STATE UNIV.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Alabama State University v. DanleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
- Gallant v. GallantCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
- Lemoine Co. of Alabama v. HLH Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Hicks v. HicksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Thomas v. MerrittSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.