Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Peek

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 2008No. COA07-1535PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCullough, Judge.

This appeal arises from a dispute concerning agreements for the sale of certain insurance products. Defendants and third-party plaintiffs, Clay Peek and Peek Performance, Inc., (“third-party plaintiffs”) appeal from an order dismissing their claims against third-party defendants, Charles Lewis, Zachary Lewis, Kingdom Insurance, LLC, Shep Cutler, and Cutler and Associates, Inc. (“third-party defendants”) pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 14(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. We dismiss this appeal as interlocutory.

The relevant facts and procedural background are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jeffreys v. Raleigh Oaks Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Green Ex Rel. Downs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Abe v. Westview Capital, L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Green v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. FarabeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Harbin Yinhai Technology, Development Co. v. Greentree Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API