Legal Opinion

M & M INV. CO. v. Regency Oaks Apartments

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 13, 1987No. 86-854PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

As originally filed, the "declaratory judgment" complaint of plaintiff/appellant M M Investment Company ("M M") was based upon a dispute between M M and defendant/appellee Regency Oaks Apartments ("Regency") over the interpretation and application of the reservation of an easement in M M's lease and the grant of an easement in Regency's deed.1 M M's lessor and Regency's grantor are one and the same person, Gordon Davis. The easement in question in both instruments relates to the same 30-foot-wide and 200-foot-long strip of land across M M's leased property and provides one of two means of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Magna, Inc. v. CatranisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Duke v. Pine Crest Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Long v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Looney v. BlackwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Alabama Power Co. v. TauntonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cousins v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Garrison v. Alabama Power CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. McGuire v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Horton v. KronerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API