Legal Opinion
Finkle v. Mayerchak
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 16, 1991No. 90-1217PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
578 So.2d 396 (1991)
Arthur A. FINKLE, and Amelia Finkle, Appellants,
v.
Joseph MAYERCHAK, Appellee.
No. 90-1217.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 16, 1991.
Rehearing Denied May 20, 1991.
Shutts & Bowen and Barbara E. Vicevich, Miami, for appellants.
Sheldon M. Schapiro, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.
Before FERGUSON, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
2Per curiam
Arthur and Amelia Finkle appeal from an adverse summary judgment in this negligence action against MPF Enterprises (MPF), the builder of their single-family home, and its qualifying agent,[1] Joseph Mayerchak.[2] MPF is not a party to this…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Gatwood v. McGeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Cueto v. Caribco Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
4Cited by5 opinions
- Murthy v. Sinha Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Recio v. GR-MHA CORP.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Thomas Learning Center, Inc. v. McGuirkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Murthy v. N. Sinha Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Recio v. GR-MHA Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006