Kuhn v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Carroll District Court. This is an action at law by which, the plaintiff seeks to recover damages of ' the defendant upon the ground that a conductor on one of its trains, upon which plaintiff was a passenger, wrongfully, maliciously and forcibly ejected the plaintiff from said train. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
The plaintiff and one King were at Coon Rapids on the line of defendant’s railroad on the thirteenth day of February, 1883. They desired to travel on the road to Manning, a station some distance *138west of Coon Rapids. They made application to the ticket-agent at Coon Rapids for tickets to Manning. The agent sold them tickets to another station called Warwick, which is a short distance east of Manning, and stated to them that the tickets were good for passage to Manning. The fact that the tickets were good for passage to Manning is conceded by the defendant, and plaintiff claims that he told the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Freese v. TrippIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Meidel v. AnthisIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Maxwell v. KennedyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Stacy v. Portland Publishing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1878
- Ganssly v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lampert v. Judge & Dolph Drug Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Press Pub. Co. v. MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
- Amos v. Prom, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
- Allen v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
- Hoagland v. Forest Park Highlands Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.