Legal Opinion
United States v. Reiner
District Court, D. Maine
Decided October 31, 2005No. CRIM. 04-127PH01PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE
HORNBY, District Judge.
I have previously ruled that Gary Reiner has no right to jury trial on the govern- merit’s request for an in personam money judgment of forfeiture. United States v. Reiner, 393 F.Supp.2d 52 (D.Me.2005). Here, I make my findings of fact and conclusions of law determining the amount of the money judgment. See Fed. R.Crim.P. 23, 32.2(b)(1).
I.Procedural Background
On September 30, 2005, a jury convicted Reiner of an interstate prostitution conspiracy (Count 1); 1 violation of the Travel Act (Count 2); 2 inducement of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. NicoloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- United States v. BlackDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- United States v. OzbayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008