Bonner v. Bonner

I concur with the conclusions reached in Parts I, II, III, and V of the “Discussion” section of the main opinion; I respectfully dissent regarding the conclusions reached in Part IV — addressing the issue of child support. The judgment of the Madison Circuit Court (“the trial court”) reads, in pertinent part:

“9. The Court finds that application of the Child Support Guidelines of Rule 32 of the Alabama Rules of Judicial Administration in this matter would be manifestly unfair or inequitable because of the joint physical custody arrangement of the order. Because of the joint custody order in…