Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miller v. Civil City of South Bend

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 24, 1990No. Nos. 88-3006, 88-3244Published

1DissentManion, Circuit Judge, joined by Coffey and Easterbrook, Circuit Judges,

Today this court holds that “freedom of speech” protects public, nonverbal, nude dancing that communicates no ideas and is considered harmful. Not surprisingly, in their briefs and at oral argument the parties never discussed the text of the First Amendment. Perhaps this is because everyone knows that “Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech”; more likely, it is because reference to the text is a stark reminder of how far First Amendment jurisprudence has gone astray.

Miller should not prevail for two reasons. First, the district court found that the nude dancing at…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API