Legal Opinion

Fountain v. Hudson Cush-N-Foam Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 11, 1960No. 59-701PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

122 So.2d 232 (1960)

Kenneth FOUNTAIN and Miami Foam Products Co., a Florida Corporation, Appellants,

v.

HUDSON CUSH-N-FOAM CORP., a New Jersey Corporation, Appellee.

No. 59-701.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 11, 1960.

Rehearing Denied July 27, 1960.

Cypen & Salmon, Miami Beach, for appellants.

Claude Pepper Law Offices, Miami, for appellee.

HORTON, Chief Judge.

This interlocutory appeal seeks review of a temporary restraining order enjoining the appellant Fountain from employment with the appellant Miami Foam Products, and the disclosure to said appellant by Fountain of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Powers Film Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  2. Carter v. AllingU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1890

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Proudfoot Consulting Co. v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Auto Club Affiliates, Inc. v. DonaheyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. Inland Rubber Corporation v. HelmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  5. Hatfield v. AutoNation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API