Legal Opinion

Samuels v. Hite

California Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1950No. L. A. 21445Published

1Opinion of the Court

35 Cal.2d 115 (1950)

ROY M. SAMUELS, Petitioner,

v.

BENJAMIN S. HITE, as Registrar of Voters, etc., Respondent.

L. A. No. 21445.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Apr. 13, 1950.

Caryl Warner, Warner & Jackson, John W. Swink and Cecil W. Collins for Petitioner.

Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel (Los Angeles), Edward H. Gaylord and C. H. Langstaff, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondent.

Frank F. Solis, in pro. per., for Real Party in Interest.

SCHAUER, J.

Petitioner, a qualified elector and taxpayer of Belvedere Township, seeks mandate to require respondent Hite, as registrar of voters of Los Angeles…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Searcy v. GrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Sheehan v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. People v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. People ex rel. Marshall v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Ward v. CrowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API