Legal Opinion

Peifer v. Landis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1833PublishedCited by 4 opinions

THIS was an action of ejectment in the circuit court of Dauphin county, tried by Justice Rogers, in which John Peifer and Sarah his wife were plaintiffs, and Christian Landis and others were defendants. ' The plaintiffs claimed the land by virtue of a parol contract, entered into between George Bower, and Sarah Bower the wife of the plaintiff.

Read the full summary

THIS was an action of ejectment in the circuit court of Dauphin county, tried by Justice Rogers, in which John Peifer and Sarah his wife were plaintiffs, and Christian Landis and others were defendants. ' The plaintiffs claimed the land by virtue of a parol contract, entered into between George Bower, and Sarah Bower the wife of the plaintiff. The plaintiffs to maintain the issue on their part, offered to prove, that George Bower, with whom the contract was made, lived in Derry township, Dauphin county, and in the fall of 1825 or spring of 1826, requested the brother of Sarah Bower, one of…

1Per curiam

There is no pretence of parol performance here, because there is no pretence of delivery of possession in pursuance of the contract; which is essential. The evidence, therefore, was properly rejected.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hertzog v. Hertzog's AdministratorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  2. M'Kee v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  3. Allen's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  4. Ensign v. KelloggMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1826

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API