Town of Hertford v. Harris
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
The Legislature has authorized municipalities to acquire property for the purposes enumerated in the petition, G.S. 160-204. If unable to agree with the owner on the amount to be paid, the municipality may condemn, G.S. 160-205.
Here, the court has found as a fact that Hertford sought in good faith to acquire title by private negotiation. Defendants have not, by exceptions, challenged the findings. The findings are conclusive. The only question then is: Do the facts found warrant the order which the court made? Schloss v. Jamison, 258 N.C. 271, 128 S.E. 2d 590; Goldsboro v. R. R., 246 N.C.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Durham v. Rigsbee.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Virginia Electric & Power Company v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Western Carolina Power Co. v. MosesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- In Re the Appeal of Reeves Broadcasting Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Durland v. PetersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- In re Condemnation of Property of SimmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. RantzMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.