In re Appeal of Klock
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
Daniel Klock, the owner of the land involved, has taken this appeal from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Blair County which affirmed an ac*643tion of the Zoning Hearing Board of Logan Township (board) rejecting the owner’s request for a variance to allow the installation of a private sewage treatment plant in order to permit development of land for single-family dwellings in conformity with the requirements of the R-l residential zoning applicable to the location.
With the exception of the one matter noted below, there is no substantial dispute in the facts…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coyne v. PrichardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Voortman v. Bucks County Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- West Goshen Township v. Bible Baptist ChurchCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Appeal of Little Britain Township from the Decision of the Zoning Hearing Board of Little Britain Township, Lancaster CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Eckert v. PierottiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Stewart v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Griffith Et Ux. v. Zhb, Exeter Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- North Penn Water Authority v. Zoning Hearing Board, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.