Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1995No. 94CA0564PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge BRIGGS.

Defendant, Edgar L. Smith, appeals the judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of theft. He asserts, among other things, that his second trial on that charge was precluded under the doctrine of collateral estoppel because, even though the jury could not reach a verdict on the charge of theft in the first trial, it acquitted him on a related charge of burglary. We reverse.

A home was burglarized at night and items of value taken. Prior to the burglary, a neighbor had called police to report the suspicious activities of two men in a vehicle.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Turner v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. People v. FryeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. Peltz v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API