Legal Opinion

Scully v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1943No. 31480PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

An amended petition was filed by the plaintiff, Sarah C. Scully, which set out 41 separate causes of action, 40 of said causes of action being assigned to her for the purpose of collection. All of the causes of action involved the right to recover damages for property located in the town of Keystone, Keith county, Nebraska, resulting from the construction of a dam and reservoir by the defendant district, four miles west of the town, and the condemnation and removal by the defendant of the Union Pacific railroad tracks from the town of Keystone, thereby entirely depriving the town of its…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Rumsey v. New York & New England R. R.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. City of Winchester v. RingIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Gledhill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hanson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Patrick v. City of BellevueNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Baum v. County of Scotts BluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Davies v. De LairNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Reikofski v. ReikofskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API