Legal Opinion

Oliver v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 5, 1933No. 15784PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALHOUN, Judge.

The offense, malicious prosecution; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The statement of facts is in question and answer form. It has long been the settled rule of this court under the statute and decisions not to consider a statement of facts filed in this court which is in question and answer form, but such statement of facts when filed here must be in narrative form in order to be considered. Knox v. State, 113 Texas Crim. Rep., 373, 22 S. W. (2d) 932; Hines v. State, 50 S. W. (2d) 823.

There are two bills of exception in the record which complain of the trial court’s refusal to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Melton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Steed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Hines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oakley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
  2. Phillipps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API