Legal Opinion
Matter of AB
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 24, 1989No. 87-1092Published
1Opinion of the Court
556 A.2d 645 (1989)
In the Matter of A.B., Appellant.
No. 87-1092.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued December 6, 1988.
Decided March 24, 1989.
Joseph B. Tulman, Supervising Atty., with whom Stuart H. Adams, Jr., Student Counsel, was on the brief, for appellant.
Charlotte M. Brookins, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Frederick D. Cooke, Jr., Corp. Counsel, Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, and Lutz Alexander Prager, Asst. Deputy Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellee.
Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, MACK, Associate Judge, and REILLY, Senior Judge.
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
This appeal…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Beausoliel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Ernesto Guarro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Gary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.