Legal Opinion

United States v. Amoroso

District Court, D. Maine

Decided April 4, 2003No. CR. 02-120-P-CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS

GENE CARTER, Senior District Judge.

Now before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Suppress (Docket Item No. 5) evidence seized from his person on October 4, 2002. Defendant contends that law enforcement authorities’ detention of him on that date was in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and that the evidence seized from him as a result of that detention should be suppressed pursuant to the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule. An evi-dentiary hearing was held before the Court on January 22,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. ChhienCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Donald CookCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Juan M. FelicianoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ByrdOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Parks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  3. Quentin Jamal Parks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  4. Quentin Jamal Parks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  5. United States v. AmorosaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API