Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tomachio v. Carter & Weekes Stevedoring Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1922Published

1DissentYoung, J.

The complaint was dismissed because the plaintiff was injured through the negligence of a fellow-servant. The plaintiff claims that the winch, although suitable for the work in hand, was unsafe and improper to do the work because it had been wound and set up to be operated in the reverse of the customary method, and so an undue burden was placed upon the winchman who was not accustomed to working a winch in that manner, and that because of this, plaintiff’s working position became unsafe. The winchman operating the machine was on the deck; the plaintiff and other employees were in the hold…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. McGovern v. Central Vermont RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Heiser v. . Cincinnati Abattoir Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Wilks v. United Marine Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API