Legal Opinion

Slayback v. Raymond

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to recover, on the ground of fraud, a judgment for the return by the defendants Raymond of certain shares of stock in the defendant company and for an accounting.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

Under the authority of Marvin v. Brooks, 94 N. Y. 71, and allied cases, this suit is well brought in equity. On the merits I find the plaintiff's story reasonable and worthy of credence, while I have not been impressed with the likelihood of the defendants’ version. I have reviewed the testimony with great care with the result that the view I took of the facts on the trial, when I saw and heard the witnesses before me, finds corroboration in many details.

The plaintiff was the financial backer of the Carbon Steel Company of New Jersey and this fact was generally known; the defendant was its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marvin v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Higgins v. . CrouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Cox v. . StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Calhoun v. . MillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Bosley v. National MacHine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of the Church of Saint Matthew & Saint Timothy v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Godfrey v. ErrettAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API