Legal Opinion

City of Arkansas City v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 25, 1994No. 70,024PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

The defendants/judgment debtors appeal the trial court’s order entering sanctions against their attorneys. The attorneys refused to allow a deposition of a third party, arguing the Kansas Rules of Civil Procedure do not allow a deposition in these circumstances.

The instant controversy is a continuation of a case first filed in 1983. The Cowley County District Court entered judgment for the plaintiffs/judgment creditors in July 1984. The creditors then began proceedings under K.S.A. 60-2419 to uncover assets which could be used to satisfy the judgment. A hearing in aid of execution…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. MarshallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Meigs v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Read v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. Fleming v. EtheringtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. Smith v. Marshall Ex Rel. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Canaan v. BarteeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. Richards v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  3. In Re Application of American Restaurant OperationsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API