Chandler v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
VILLANTI, Judge.
Charles Chandler appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(1). Chandler alleged that he had just learned that he would be subject to conditional release upon his release from prison and that this constituted “newly discovered evidence,” entitling him to file this otherwise untimely motion. Because Chandler’s motion is deemed timely and is facially sufficient, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.
On October 4, 2000, Chandler pleaded no contest to charges of robbery without a weapon…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Ey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Mayes v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Roberti v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Deck v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gusow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Flint v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- United States v. FranklinDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
- Fowler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- JAY LARSON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.