Legal Opinion
Cranford v. Farnsworth & Chambers Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1958No. 5896PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is here on a stipulated record. On March 2, 1956 Thomas A. Cranford, an employee of the defendant Farnsworth & Chambers Company, Inc., received an injury for which he filed a claim under the New Mexico Workmen’s Compensation Law and was awarded the sum of $16.50 per week for a period of 550 weeks. On March 17, 1957 Cran-ford died. His widow brought this action in a state court to recover the amount of the award accruing after the death of her husband. The complaint did not allege that the injury was the proximate cause of the death. The case was removed to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Township of Hillsborough v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Huddleston v. DwyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Steele v. General Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gonzales v. Sharp & Fellows Contracting Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. AdairCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Cranford v. Farnsworth & Chambers CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Cities Service Oil Company v. AdairCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Gary Rawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Gary Rawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987