Legal Opinion

Adams v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 23, 1900No. French Spoliations, No. 314, 771, 685PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On the defendants' Motion. The Reporters’ statement of the case: The facts in regard to the motion appear sufficiently in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

WeldoN, J\,

delivered the opinion of the court:

On the 14th of February, 1889, the court reported findings of fact and conclusions of law in which are allowed to Samuel R. Adams, administrator, the sum of $3,216.25 in case No. 314; to Robert Beverly, administrator in case No. 771, the sum of $994.83; and disallowing Harriet E. Sabor, administrator in case No. 685, as not proved. On the 16th day of February, 1892, the counsel for claimants, Samuel R. Adams and Robert Beverly, made a motion to amend the findings of fact and.conclusions of law, increasing the allowance to Samuel R. Adams,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Block v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1871

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1901
  2. Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1911
  3. Shapely v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1903
  4. Clarke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1907
  5. Eaton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API