Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Henley

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1971No. 71-1557_1Published

1Per curiam

This appeal from the district court’s denial of Henley’s Rule 35, F.R.Cr.P., motion challenges that Court’s imposition of consecutive sentences for the offenses of which he was convicted. This Court has already rejected the identical contention raised herein upon a previous appeal filed by the appellant. Henley v. United States, 5th Cir. 1970, 433 F.2d 960. Accordingly, the district court’s denial of relief is affirmed. 1

1. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jesse Coy Kimbrough v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Michael Henley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API