Legal Opinion

Howe v. Prokop

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 31, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The guardian of Edna M. Murray brought this action in a Probate Court against the defendant, a friend of the ward, to recover funds allegedly belonging to the ward. Judgment entered for the plaintiff. We affirm.

1. Alleged bias of the judge. The Probate Court judge in this action had also presided in an earlier proceeding in which the defendant had sought to be appointed conservator of the estate of the ward, a woman then eighty-six years of age. On November 2, 1982, the judge had appointed the plaintiff as guardian.

In this action, the defendant was represented by counsel other than the one…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Furtado v. FurtadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. King v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Ricky Smith Pontiac, Inc. v. Subaru of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  4. Lena v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. LeventhalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Care & Protection of ZitaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Home Depot v. KardasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  4. Civil Service Commission v. Boston Municipal Court DepartmentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  5. Dao Bui v. VazquezMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API