Legal Opinion

Shaddock v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

By a judgment in a former action the city of Buffalo, its officers and agents, were enjoined from making any other or further payments to the present petitioner upon a certain contract for work at the Perrysburg Tuberculosis Hospital of the city of Buffalo which contract was determined to be illegal. (Fraser v. City of Buffalo, 215 App. Div. 861; affd., 243 N. Y. 554.) The petitioner thereafter filed with the council of the city of Buffalo a petition setting forth that a large amount of work had been done by bim under this contract in good faith and in reliance upon its validity, and that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Dady v. . PrendergastNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. People ex rel. Dady v. PrendergastAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Ward v. . KropfNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Fraser v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Fraser v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boland v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API