Legal Opinion

Denton v. Barr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 29, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

*631On a prior appeal, this Court found, inter alia, that pursuant to the parties’ stipulation of settlement, petitioner was “entitled to attorney’s fees and we accordingly remand for a hearing to determine the amount of those fees” (Matter of Thomas B. v Lydia D., 69 AD3d 24, 32 [2009]). There is no merit to respondent’s argument that petitioner was not entitled to attorney’s fees under the terms of the parties’ stipulation. However, we find that the court, in determining the amount of fees due to petitioner, relied on documents that constituted inadmissible hearsay, namely, billing statements…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas B. v. Lydia D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Seinfeld v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API