State v. Encinias
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
■COMPTON, Justice.
The question presented is whether appellee had a preliminary examination as required by Article II, Section 14, New Mexico Constitution, which reads:
“No persons shall be so held on information without having had a preliminary examination before an examining magistrate, or having waived such preliminary examination.”
Appellee Luis Encinias was charged by criminal complaint filed- in the office of the District Clerk of -San Miguel County of ■having committed a felony, whereupon the resident district judge entered an order disqualifying himself and designating The Honorable…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re SantillanesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. LazarovichNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- Ravany v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United StatesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977