Legal Opinion

State v. Encinias

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1949No. 5159PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■COMPTON, Justice.

The question presented is whether appellee had a preliminary examination as required by Article II, Section 14, New Mexico Constitution, which reads:

“No persons shall be so held on information without having had a preliminary examination before an examining magistrate, or having waived such preliminary examination.”

Appellee Luis Encinias was charged by criminal complaint filed- in the office of the District Clerk of -San Miguel County of ■having committed a felony, whereupon the resident district judge entered an order disqualifying himself and designating The Honorable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re SantillanesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State v. LazarovichNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Ravany v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United StatesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API