Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Fisher v. Rowe

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 9, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.

Section 76 (2) of the 1931 Chancery Act (Chapter 14658, Acts of 1931) reads as follows:

“(2) No Notice to Party in Default; No notice of any motion, hearing or any other proceeding under a bill of complaint or under answer asserting a counterclaim and praying affirmative relief shall be required as to a party against whom a decree pro confesso has been taken, and no time need elapse as to any such defaulting party in order to allow the court to proceed with the cause.”

An alternative writ of mandamus was applied for in this cause alleging that respondent M. G. Rowe is the duly qualified and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wade v. WadeSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Keen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  3. State ex rel. Ross v. CallSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  4. Garner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. HessSupreme Court of Florida · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bay View Estates Corp. v. SoutherlandSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. Lundstrom v. LyonSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. In Re: Petition of Fla. State Bar Ass'n.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. State Ex Rel. Fisher v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API