Lemoge Electric v. County of San Mateo
California Supreme Court
1DissentShenk, J.
I dissent.
On the undisputed facts of the ease section 3399 of the Civil Code was properly invoked by the plaintiff and it is entitled to relief by reformation. The record shows that on January 19, 1954, the board of supervisors of the defendant county opened bids for electrical work in connection with *667the county hospital. The bid of the plaintiff was the lowest. The board had reserved the right to reject any and all bids and to accept none for 30 days. No award of contract was made on the day the bids were opened nor until February 2d.
On January 22,1954, three days after the bids were opened,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Bailard v. MardenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Bruce v. MieirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932