Legal Opinion

Goddard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 13, 1983No. AP-106PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Section 812.019(2), Florida Statutes, imposes criminal sanctions upon “any person who initiates, organizes, plans, finances, directs, manages, or supervises the theft of property and traffics in such stolen property.” Appellant was found guilty by jury of violating that statutory prohibition. The only issue raised on appeal which merits discussion is appellant’s contention that Section 812.019(2), Florida Statutes, was not intended to apply to him, a common thief who individually stole the goods in question1 and then trafficked in same.2 We disagree.

It is a well-settled rule that where the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goddard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1985
  3. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1989
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1988
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API