Parts and Electric Motors, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Sterling Electric, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
This is an antitrust case brought by Parts and Electric Motors, Inc. (“P & E”) against Sterling Electric, Inc. (“Sterling”). P & E is a terminated distributor of Sterling brand electric motors and parts. P & E charges that Sterling violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and Section 3 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 14, by tying sales of its electric motors (the tied product) to sales of its replacement parts (the tying product). The jury delivered a verdict for P & E on its tying claim. The verdict was set aside in a post-trial order entering judgment…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- George Rakovich v. Gregory Wade and Darryl Drake, George Rakovich v. Chester KassCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Parts and Electric Motors, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Sterling Electric, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Video Views, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Studio 21, Ltd., and Joseph Sclafani, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Morrison Knudsen Corp. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Marian Hutter Owen v. Herbert Wangerin, Mary Wangerin, Dave ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.