Legal Opinion

Taylor v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 1, 1913No. 885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 28066 (T. D. 32379). .

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The importations are rapeseed meal, which was by the collector assessed for duty at 20 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 480 of the tariff act of August 5, 1909, as a nonenumerated manufactured article. The importers claim the merchandise to be entitled to free entry under paragraph 581 of the same act, which reads as follows:

581. Guano, manures, and all substances used only for manure, including basic slag, ground or unground, and calcium cyanamid or lime nitrogen.

'The Board of General Appraisers overruled the protest, held that the term “substances used only for manure” applied to a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Mullett's Administratrix v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stoeger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. United States v. SwiftCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Roger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. International Models, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. Gerhard & Hey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API