Legal Opinion

Hempel v. Palmateer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 2003No. 99C-17509; A115504PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying him post-conviction relief. He argues that his appellate counsel should have assigned error to one of the trial court’s rulings. We affirm.

Petitioner was charged with first-degree sex abuse and first-degree unlawful sexual penetration of an eight-year-old child. At trial, petitioner’s defense centered on his claim that no penetration had taken place and that he had not acted knowingly. According to petitioner, if he touched the victim, he did so only in his sleep while having a dream. During closing argument, petitioner’s attorney pointed out to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Guinn v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. GuritzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garner v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Harbert v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API