In the Interest of KTB
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Chief Judge.
The issue presented for resolution in this appeal is the meaning of “available to testify” as that phrase is employed in OCGA § 24-3-16: “A statement made by a child under the age of 14 years describing any act of sexual contact or physical abuse performed with or on the child by another is admissible in evidence by the testimony of the person or persons to whom made if the child is available to testify in the proceedings and the court finds that the circumstances of the statement provide sufficient indicia of reliability.” (Emphasis supplied.)
This issue arises in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sosebee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- State v. John DoeWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BoundsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Woodruff v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Moody v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Mantooth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.