Legal Opinion

State v. McDonald

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2013No. 2012-1177PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, which involves a felony enhancement for failure to comply with the signal or order of a police officer under R.C. 2921.331(C)(5)(a)(ii), we consider whether a jury’s verdict complies with the requirements of R.C. 2945.75. Specifically, we consider whether a jury verdict that includes a finding of “substantial risk of serious physical harm to persons or property,” the enhancement element of R.C. 2921.331(C)(5)(a)(ii), is sufficient to sustain a third-degree-felony conviction for a violation of R.C. 2921.331(B) when the verdict fails to set forth the degree of the offense…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PelfreyOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. SchwableOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. McDonaldOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. DillardOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. KilbaneOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. EasterlingOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. SandersOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API