Legal Opinion

Mitchel v. Dover

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 22, 1953No. 4219PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodnow, J.

The defendant first asserts that by its exception to the orders of mistrial made by the Presiding Justice after the close of the evidence, the cases are transferred to this court for a determination of the facts. With this contention we are not in agreement. The general ground upon which a mistrial is ordinarily declared by the Trial Court is the existence of some circumstance which indicates that justice may not be done if the trial continues to a verdict. The result of such an order, whether made after the close of the evidence or at an earlier point in the trial, is the discharge of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perkins v. GeorgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1864

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Panas v. HarakisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. Adams v. BradshawSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. Brigham v. Hudson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Hurley v. Town of HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Rotella v. McGovernSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API