Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. LaCoste

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 25, 2002No. 3383Published

1DissentAnderson, J.

I respectfully dissent. The majority concludes the trial court erred in refusing to admit certain hearsay statements made by an unknown male bystander. In addition, the majority holds simple assault is a lesser included offense of criminal domestic violence. I disagree as to both issues.

*168I. STATEMENTS MADE BY UNKNOWN MALE BYSTANDER

LaCoste complains the trial court erred in refusing to admit, under the exception for either excited utterance or present sense impression, certain hearsay statements made by an unknown male bystander which corroborated LaCoste’s testimony. I disagree.

The admission…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Miller, Carol A., and Miller, Howard C., Her Husband v. Keating, Lawrence M., and Texaco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. State v. EaslerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. State v. BassArizona Supreme Court · 2000

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API