Legal Opinion

Cutter v. Pool

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLarremore, J.

The plaintiff applies on motion, in pursuance of section 388 of the Code of Procedure, for an inspection and copy of defendant’s books of account. This section, which enlarges the remedy for obtaining discovery of evi*312deuce, has been decided to be auxiliary to, and not a substitute for, the provisions of the Revised Statutes.

In the repealing act, passed June 5, 1877, section 388 of the old Code is repealed, the same not being mentioned in the sections therein excepted from repeal.

The remedy sought must now be had under sections 803 to 808 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which are a virtual…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dickie v. AustinNew York City Court · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API