Goltz v. Winona & St. Peter Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Winona county, Mitchell, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict for defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
This is an action in which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for being run over by a railroad car through defendant’s alleged negligence. The jury brought in a general verdict for the defendant, and also answers to certain specific questions of fact submitted by the court. So far as important upon the present appeal, the questions and answers are as follows:
Question 1. Was the defendant guilty of negligence which produced the injuries to plaintiff ? Ansiuer. Yes.
Question 2. If yea, wherein, and in what respect, was defendant thus negligent ? Ansiuer. Upon the second special question we…
2Cited by1 opinion
- State ex rel. Stevenson v. BabcockNebraska Supreme Court · 1885