Legal Opinion

Browning v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 19, 1954No. 26969Published

1Opinion

ON SECOND MOTION FOR REHEARING

WOODLEY, Judge.

It is again insisted that under the rule stated and applied in Anderson v. State, 132 Texas Cr. Rep. 37, 105 S.W. 2d 258; Baker v. State, 132 Texas Cr. Rep. 527, 106 S.W. 2d 308; Rice v. State, 37 Texas Cr. Rep. 36, 38 S.W. 801; and U.S. v. Cook, 21 L. Ed. 538, the information is fatally defective in failing to negative that the barbiturate was a compound, mixture or preparation such as declared to be without the act in Sec. 4 thereof; and in failing to negative the premise that barbiturate may have been delivered by a pharmacist or practitioner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Rice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API