Legal Opinion
Castro v. Beecher
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 7, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-2982-CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAFFREY, Chief Judge.
This case arises on a post-judgment petition for an injunction pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1651, which gives federal courts the power to issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their jurisdiction. Petitioners, who were plaintiffs in the original Castro v. Beecher ease, seek, inter alia, an injunction enjoining the Civil Service Commission and twenty-seven Massachusetts cities and towns from “making police appointments or approving police appointments or failing to cancel police appointments” in any manner not consistent with the Consent…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Louisiana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Follette v. BurgosSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carter v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
- Town of Milton v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Argento v. Village of Melrose ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Sullivan v. City of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. CareyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Boston Chapter, NAACP v. BeecherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Castro v. BeecherDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.