Legal Opinion

Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Vaughan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 27, 1922No. 6 Div. 638Published

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The evidence in this case was sufficient from which the jury could reasonably infer the plaintiff’s cow was struck by defendant’s engine within one-quarter of a mile of the public road crossing at McCombs station. This made out a prima facie case for the plaintiff, imposing upon defendant the burden of acquitting itself of negligence. Cent. of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Turner, 145 Ala. 441, 40 South. 355. The jury could also reasonably infer from the evidence that the engineer failed to comply with the requirements of'section 5473 of the Code of 1907, as to ringing the bell and blowing the whistle.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API