Legal Opinion
Smith v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 24, 1991No. LUBA 90-160; CA A69636Published
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s decision affirming the City of Portland’s conditional use permit for a homeless shelter. The shelter was allowed as an “institutional care facility” (ICF), rather than a “residential care facility” (RCF). The former is defined in Portland City Code 33.12.427:
“ ‘Institutional care facility’ means an establishment which provides housing, training or care to more than 15 people who require such services by reason of their circumstances or condition.
“A facility or institution that is operated for the purpose of providing both care and planned treatment or planned…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Oswego Properties, Inc. v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991