Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 24, 1991No. LUBA 90-160; CA A69636Published

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s decision affirming the City of Portland’s conditional use permit for a homeless shelter. The shelter was allowed as an “institutional care facility” (ICF), rather than a “residential care facility” (RCF). The former is defined in Portland City Code 33.12.427:

“ ‘Institutional care facility’ means an establishment which provides housing, training or care to more than 15 people who require such services by reason of their circumstances or condition.
“A facility or institution that is operated for the purpose of providing both care and planned treatment or planned…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Oswego Properties, Inc. v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API