Legal Opinion

Boyer v. Meeks

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1929No. 13,272PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, P. J.

Action by David Meeks, appellee herein, in replevin against Vila Boyer, David Addams and Daniel Sharp to obtain possession of an automobile. A trial by the court resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal and contend that decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence.

The facts as shown by the undisputed evidence are, in substance, as follows:

On May 7,1927, David Addams filed his complaint before Sharp, a justice of the peace, against appellee and William Crockett to recover a judgment on a promissory note. Summons was issued returnable May 12, and placed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lowry v. McGeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Steele v. HarknessWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Cunningham v. JacobsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Hoffman v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State ex rel. Mason v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haimbaugh Landscaping, Inc. v. JegenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Whinery v. KozacikIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Transcontinental Credit Corp. v. James SimkinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Richardson v. Lake County Department of Public WelfareIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Brockhaus v. ALLENIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API