Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 23, 1999No. 98-1068PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

740 So.2d 581 (1999)

Isaac HILL, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 98-1068.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

July 23, 1999.

James R. Valerino, Sanford, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

2Per curiam

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in sentencing him as a violent career criminal[1] under Chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, in that the statute is unconstitutional as violative of the single subject rule of the Florida Constitution. Art. III § 6, Fla. Const. We…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Higgs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. Walker v. BentleySupreme Court of Florida · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Melgares v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Crawford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API