Legal Opinion

Baker v. Grant

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 2, 1986No. 85-1539PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COBB, Judge.

The trial court dismissed the plaintiff’s case with prejudice for violation of a court order, dated July 2, 1985, which required the plaintiff to obtain an attorney, notice for hearing a defense motion to dismiss, and serve said notice at least seven days prior to a hearing scheduled on August 22, 1985. This order is unreasonable. A defendant (or the court) can notice outstanding defense motions without requiring the plaintiff to do it.

Additionally, a civil claimant is not required, barring extraordinary circumstances, to be represented by counsel. Unless a case is presented which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ray v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Platel v. MAGUIRE, VOORHIS & WELLS, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Shotkin v. CohenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clement v. Marcus, Stowell & Beye, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Hicks v. HicksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API