Baker v. Grant
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
COBB, Judge.
The trial court dismissed the plaintiff’s case with prejudice for violation of a court order, dated July 2, 1985, which required the plaintiff to obtain an attorney, notice for hearing a defense motion to dismiss, and serve said notice at least seven days prior to a hearing scheduled on August 22, 1985. This order is unreasonable. A defendant (or the court) can notice outstanding defense motions without requiring the plaintiff to do it.
Additionally, a civil claimant is not required, barring extraordinary circumstances, to be represented by counsel. Unless a case is presented which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ray v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Platel v. MAGUIRE, VOORHIS & WELLS, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Shotkin v. CohenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clement v. Marcus, Stowell & Beye, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Hicks v. HicksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998