Legal Opinion
Davis v. City of San Jose
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 24, 2014No. Case No. 14-cv-02035-BLFPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
[Re: ECF 33]
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge
In this civil rights lawsuit against individual police officers of the San Jose Police Department, defendants Michael Monto-nye, Tyler Krauel, and Thomas Boyle (collectively “Defendants”) have moved to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) by plaintiff Anthony Davis for failure to state a claim.1 Def.’s Mot., ECF 33. On September 18, 2014, the Court heard oral argument on Defendants’ motion. Having considered the parties’ respective…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Scalia v. Cnty. of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Jackson v. TelladoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Warren v. MarcusDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Booke v. County of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Gregory v. City of VallejoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.